Introduction

The buzzing insurgence of the civilians in the several Middle-Eastern countries against their autocratic government turned into armored rebellion in Syria. The autocratic rulers and their activities seemed to be the unbreakable tyranny. Yet the power of civilians shook their throne. Bashar al-Assad, the president of Syria, has been in office for more than 40 years. It should be noted that he is not an elected president and Syria is not a democratic country. He inherited the supreme power from his father. Thus, he considers himself the eligible ruler of Syria and does not think of accountability, honesty, and democracy. This sense of feeling made him the despotic ruler.

Historical Background to the Conflict

It was reported that the government forces of Syria used chemical weapons against the militias fighting against Assad forces. According to Heydemann (2013), “As the Syrian revolution enters its third year, the risks to regional stability are escalating”. Aggression and violence are all over Syria including its border regions. On the other hand, the egocentricity is much important to the U.S. government and they settle their foreign policy based on that egocentricity they are blaming Assad regime depending on the U.S. intelligence report and keeping diplomatic pressure on Assad government. According to Sharp and Blanchard (2013), “Members of Congress and Administration officials are debating options for responding militarily to President Bashar al Assad’s forces’ reported use of chemical weapons in attacks on rebel-held areas and civilians”.

U.S. Economic War against Syria

The meeting was held by eight leaders in Lough Erne located in Northern Ireland, urged for an international conference due to the ongoing turbulence in Syria. Now, the Obama administration is seemingly in confidential contract with Iran and Russia since these two countries are considered to be the Syrian buffer states. According to the report, an American Plan B was rejected by the Obama administration. The U.S. administration and the Pentagon are undertaking charitable rescue program. Western diplomats in Lebanon stated that it is considered to be equal to Marshal Plan. Indeed, the pro-Zionist propensity to the U.S. administration and occupying nature of the Israeli government are much active in this regard. Alternatively, “Obama administration’s decision to directly supply weapons to the Syrian opposition may end up torpedoing the possibility of a political settlement” (Hallinan, 2013).

Actually, Washington wants to take control over the Syrian economy which will open the door to govern Syria in one sense. The U.S. administration wants to secure tree hundred billion dollars in the name of rebuilding post-Assad Syrian government where International Monetary Fund economists assess the value which consists of half a trillion dollars. Yet Syrians are able to rebuild their country. Although financial help is much greeted by the Syrians, they do not want to surrender the Syrian Arab Republic to a novel western monetary order. “What is hidden in the war on Syria is reported to be much bigger than has been divulged to date” (Lamb, 2013).

Some Western Diplomatic sources stated that some Gulf countries and the U.S. government attempted to bribe Syrian President’s cousin, Rami Makhlouf, and some Syrian nationalists to break the affiliation with the government but failed whereas many Syrian capitalists fell into the trap. The U.S. government and its co-partners seem to initiate an economic war constricting economic sanctions by which common people are affected in various ways. Actually, the common people are suffering from food, medical facilities, and fuel costs. The U.S. and its foreign policy makers want to dismiss Makhlouf and others like him because they are the main barrier in implementing the Western economic scheme in Syria. Makhlouf and his company are the main source of financial power of the Syrian government and have the economic strength to rebuild Syria. The reason for targeting Makhlouf and other businessmen is to weaken the Syrian economy that will make the path smoother to occupy Syria which is more certain than military action to damage a country like Syria. According to Lamb (2013), “The targeting of Mr. Rami Makhlouf and dozens of like-minded Syrian businessmen, who refused to abandon their country, continues”

Need a complete copy of the Conflict Between The United States and Syria Essay ? Get your copy below:

Attachments:

File	Description	File size
Conflict Between The United States and Syria	Essay [ 3481 words]	210 kB